Skip to main content
Enterprise Software  ·  BPMN Platform  ·  Canadian SMB  ·  2019–2020

Enterprise Software Sales: Largest Deals from a Dormant Pipeline, in Five Months

Trisotech, a Canadian enterprise software company in BPMN and decision modeling. Two consecutive bEffective operator engagements, October 2019 to October 2020.

Engagement  Oct 2019 – Oct 2020 Two engagements Mike Reardon, operator of record
27 / 11
Opportunities / closed deals
Engagement 1
$350–500K+
Recurring revenue per deal
Engagement 2
5 months
To largest deals in
company history
01  ·  The Company

Strong product, real market, no repeatable revenue motion

Trisotech is a Canadian enterprise software company. Their platform serves complex decision modelling and business process management at scale, the kind of system Fortune 500s and large public-sector organizations buy when their existing process tooling has hit a ceiling. Strong product. Real market. The challenge was repeatable revenue conversion, not capability.

02  ·  The Problem

A pipeline that looked empty was actually dormant

Two consecutive engagements, two related problems. The first looked like an inbound conversion problem. The second turned out to be hidden in plain sight in the existing prospect database.

Engagement 1: Inbound leads not converting at the speed the business needed. Marketing was generating activity. Sales did not have a defined customer, a structured outbound prospecting motion, or a targeted message by segment. Inbound was leaking through the funnel; outbound was not running at all.
Engagement 2: A “dormant” qualified pipeline that nobody had recognized. Inside three months of historical prospect data was a pattern: a qualified customer segment that had engaged twice, including with product demos, and never followed up. The opportunity was not new. It was sitting in the existing CRM, unworked.

If your existing prospect database has buyers who showed up twice and never came back, is the answer to chase more new prospects, or to figure out why the ones you already have stopped engaging? Usually the second, because the answer to the first is buried in the answer to the second.

03  ·  What We Did

Two engagements, same discipline

Two consecutive engagements across 13 months. Same discipline applied to two related problems, first an inbound conversion gap, then a dormant pipeline that nobody had recognized. Define the customer, structure the motion, execute the cadence.

Engagement 01  ·  Pipeline Build

Inbound customer and structured pipeline (Blueprint + Build)

  • Defined the right customer from the marketing-generated inbound stream.
  • Mapped the inbound sales motion into a structured pipeline.
  • Built an outbound prospecting strategy with targeted messaging by segment.
  • Result in 8 months: 27 new business opportunities, 11 deals closed, over $1M in recurring annual revenue.
Engagement 02  ·  Pattern Discovery

Dormant customer recovery (Blueprint, kept simple)

  • Analyzed three months of existing prospect data.
  • Identified the dormant pattern: a qualified customer segment that had engaged twice with demos and never followed up.
  • The data surfaced the opportunity. The strategy defined how to re-engage it.
Engagement 02  ·  Cadence Execution

Build at speed, in-person, on a weekly cadence

  • Targeted healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing decision-makers from the existing database.
  • Executed 3 to 4 weekly in-person presentations on a sustained cadence.
  • Closed mid-six-figure transactions over a 3 to 4 month sales cycle, including a Fortune 500 military shipbuilder and a publicly funded health-services provider.
  • Each deal generated $350K to $500K+ in annual subscription revenue.
04  ·  What Changed

Largest deals in company history, in five months

27 / 11 / $1M+
Engagement 1  ·  opportunities, deals,
recurring revenue in 8 months
$350K–$500K+
Engagement 2  ·  annual subscription
per deal, including Fortune 500 anchor
5 months
Combined  ·  largest deals in
company history closed
Metric
Figure
Context
Engagement 1: opportunities
27
New B2B, customer-defined and qualified
Engagement 1: deals closed
11
~40% close rate on qualified opportunities
Engagement 1: recurring revenue
$1M+
Annual recurring, generated in 8 months
Engagement 2: deal size
$350K–$500K+
Annual subscription per deal
Engagement 2: timeline
5 months
To largest deals in company history
Engagement 2: anchor account
Fortune 500
Military shipbuilder, plus publicly-funded health services

Engagement 1 fixed an inbound conversion problem with a defined customer and a structured pipeline: 27 opportunities, 11 deals, $1M+ recurring annual revenue in eight months. Engagement 2 mined the existing prospect database for a dormant customer pattern, and produced the largest deals in Trisotech’s history in five months, anchored by a Fortune 500 military shipbuilder. Two engagements, same discipline: define the customer, structure the motion, execute the cadence. The question is rarely whether the prospects exist. The question is whether the system to convert them does.

05  ·  The Client's Voice

On building the systems that close the leaks

“Mike is an experienced and skilled operator. He works diligently at identifying the right personas in the target market to ensure his success. He is focused, strategic, and brings to bear many years of experience to fix our revenue leaks in demand, conversion, and sales areas.”

“Studious, he works to understand our Ideal Customer Profile’s pains and how to approach, engage and close with the potential customer. He creates the systems for addressing the needs of the client with the intent to meet or if possible exceed their expectations. I recommend Mike as your Revenue Operator.”

Jacques Hamel Chief Digital Transformation Officer  ·  Trisotech
06  ·  Why This Is Relevant to You

Three readers see this case differently. Here is how each one should read it.

If your CRM has more historical prospects than your sales team can name, and most B2B businesses do by year three, Trisotech is the case to read. Each lens below answers a different question on the same data.

Owner Lens

“Are my largest deals already in my CRM?”

Trisotech’s largest deals in company history were not new prospects. They were buyers who had already shown up twice, including for product demos, and then stopped following up. The fix was not more leads. It was a Blueprint that surfaced the dormant pattern, and a Build that re-engaged the right buyers with a structured weekly cadence. Most companies running an outbound motion at all are running it against people who have never heard of them. The dormant pipeline inside the existing database is usually larger and warmer.

CFO Lens

“What is the cost of not recognizing the buyers we already have?”

Engagement 1 produced $1M+ in recurring annual revenue in 8 months. Engagement 2 produced the largest deals in company history, $350K to $500K+ each in annual subscription, in 5 months. Both came from prospects who already existed in the CRM. The CFO line: the cost of acquiring those buyers a second time was nearly zero. The cost of not recognizing them was the entire revenue stream they represented. A CFO should know what the dormant pipeline inside the existing CRM is worth, every quarter it sits unworked is a quarter of revenue forfeited.

PE Lens

“Is this asset’s growth a system or a story?”

For a PE-considered SaaS or enterprise software asset, two questions matter most: is the growth repeatable, and does it transfer in due diligence? Trisotech proved repeatability across two consecutive engagements with the same discipline, define the customer, structure the motion, execute the cadence. The largest deals closed because a system was applied, not because a new opportunity appeared. The asset value here is not the customers won; it is the demonstrated capability to identify and convert dormant pipeline inside any acquired CRM. That capability is the multiple-expander.

07  ·  The AI Sidebar

If today’s AI had been available in 2020

The dormant-pipeline recovery motion run in 2020 did three things manually. Today’s AI does not change the insight or the system, it compounds the running of it.

Then  ·  2019–2020

How Engagement 2 actually ran

  • Pattern recognition across three months of prospect data, manual analysis to surface the dormant customer segment
  • Account research before each in-person presentation, built by hand, account by account
  • Cadence management for 3 to 4 weekly in-person presentations, tracked in a structured weekly rhythm
Now  ·  Started in 2026

The same insight, accelerated by AI

  • AI lead-scoring runs the dormant-pattern detection continuously, surfaced in real time, not discovered as a project
  • AI account intelligence keeps stakeholder maps and buying-committee changes fresh, live, not point-in-time
  • Conversation intelligence captures post-meeting coaching and automates the follow-up, cadence runs itself

“The dormant-pipeline insight does not require AI to work. AI just makes it run continuously rather than as a project.”